Top Ad 728x90

samedi 24 janvier 2026

7-Layer Dip Recipe

by


 

The 7-Layer Dip has moved beyond its origins as a mid-century "party hack" to become a masterclass in stratified culinary engineering. As global palates demand a balance of high-density nutrients and complex textural contrast, the modern 7-layer dip utilizes specific techniques in moisture management and lipid stabilization to ensure that each layer remains distinct, vibrant, and structurally sound.
This comprehensive guide explores the molecular physics of the "dip-stack," the chemistry of oxidation prevention, and the definitive recipe for the ultimate party centerpiece.


I. The "Vertical Stack"


The primary challenge of a 7-layer dip is syneresis—the leaking of liquid from one layer into another, resulting in a soggy, "muddy" mess, we solve this through hydrophobic barriers. By strategically placing fats (like cheese and olives) between high-moisture layers (like salsa and beans), we create a "waterproof" architecture that keeps the dip fresh for hours.


II. Essential Ingredients: The "Seven"

To achieve the standard, each layer must be selected for its specific chemical contribution to the final sensory experience.

Layer
Layer 1 : Refried Black Beans + Cumin
The "Foundation." Provides structural integrity and earthiness.
Layer 2 : Lime-Stabilized Guacamole
The "Lipid Layer." Provides creaminess and healthy fats.
Layer 3 : Probiotic Sour Cream + Taco Spice
The "Cooling Layer." Balances heat and provides tang.
Layer 4 : Dehydrated Pico de Gallo (Salsa)
The "Acid Layer." Provides brightness and "pop."
Layer 5 : Sharp Cheddar & Monterey Jack
The "Salt Layer." Provides savory umami and texture.
Layer 6 : Brined Black Olives
The "Brine Layer." Acts as a flavor enhancer and moisture barrier.
Layer 7 : Fresh Scallions & Cilantro
The "Fresh Layer." Provides the final aromatic lift.

III. The Molecular Science of the Layers


1. Preventing "Guacamole Gray" (Oxidation)
We utilize ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) and the "fat-seal" method. By adding a generous amount of lime juice to the guacamole and placing it directly beneath the sour cream, we eliminate air contact, keeping the avocado vibrant green for up to 48 hours.


2. The Salsa Sieve Technique

The biggest enemy of a 7-layer dip is watery salsa, professional standards require the salsa to be strained for 20 minutes in a fine-mesh sieve. This removes the "tomato water," ensuring the acid stays in the layer and doesn't run down to turn the beans into soup.


3. Bean Texture Management

Black beans are preferred for their higher anthocyanin content. We "loosen" the refried beans with a touch of vegetable broth and lime juice to ensure they are scoopable without breaking the chip.


IV. The Definitive 7-Layer Dip Recipe


Ingredients:
Layer 1: 2 cans (15 oz) Refried Black Beans, mixed with 1 tsp Cumin and 1/2 tsp Smoked Paprika.
Layer 2: 3 large Ripe Avocados, mashed with the juice of 2 Limes, 1/2 tsp Sea Salt, and 1 tbsp Finely Minced Shallot.
Layer 3: 1 cup Sour Cream (Full fat) mixed with 1 tbsp Taco Seasoning (Chili powder, garlic, onion powder).
Layer 4: 1.5 cups Chunky Salsa, strained through a sieve for 20 minutes to remove excess liquid.
Layer 5: 1.5 cups Shredded Sharp Cheddar (Hand-grated for better melt and flavor).
Layer 6: 1/2 cup Sliced Black Olives (Canned or brined).
Layer 7: 1/2 cup Sliced Scallions and 1/4 cup Fresh Cilantro, finely chopped.


Instructions:

The Foundation: Spread the seasoned beans in an even layer at the bottom of a 9x13 glass dish. Smooth with an offset spatula.
The Seal: Spread the lime-guacamole over the beans. Ensure it touches the edges of the dish to create a seal.
The Cream: Carefully layer the seasoned sour cream over the guacamole.
The Acid: Top the sour cream with the strained, "dry" salsa.
The Salt: Sprinkle the cheese evenly over the salsa.
The Brine: Scatter the olives over the cheese.
The Freshness: Top with scallions and cilantro just before serving.
The Set: Refrigerate for at least 1 hour before serving. This allows the layers to "set" and the flavors to migrate slightly, creating a unified taste profile.


V. Nutritional Profile: The Perspective


In 2026, this dip is viewed as a "High-Fiber Social Fuel":
Heart Health: The high volume of monounsaturated fats from the avocados and fiber from the black beans supports healthy cholesterol levels.
Antioxidant Density: The "vibrant" ingredients (cilantro, scallions, salsa) are rich in quercetin and lycopene.
Probiotic Support, many home cooks utilize cultured sour cream or Greek yogurt, providing a boost of beneficial gut bacteria.


VI. Conclusion


The 7-Layer Dip is a testament to the fact that classic recipes only get better with a bit of science. By focusing on liquid extraction (the salsa sieve) and oxidation control (the lime seal), you transform a potentially messy appetizer into a crisp, colorful, and architecturally perfect masterpiece. It remains the ultimate expression of the "Social Gastronomy" movement .

Banana Bundt Cake Recipe

by


  The Banana Bundt Cake has undergone a culinary transformation. No longer just a way to utilize overripe fruit, it is now celebrated as a masterclass in moisture-to-crumb ratios and aromatic depth. As home bakers prioritize "texture-first" desserts, this recipe utilizes specific techniques like banana caramelization and lipid-emulsion to ensure a cake that is dense, succulent, and structurally perfect for the iconic fluted mold.

This comprehensive guide explores the molecular science of banana starches, the physics of the Bundt pan, and the definitive recipe for the ultimate "shatter-crust" banana cake.

I. The Anatomy of a Master Bundt

A Bundt cake is defined by its architecture. Unlike a layer cake, which relies on frosting for moisture, a Bundt must stand on its own, the benchmark for a Banana Bundt is a "Velvet Crumb"—a texture that is tight enough to hold the intricate details of the pan but soft enough to melt on the tongue.

II. Essential Ingredients

Success in this recipe depends on the chemical state of your bananas and the quality of your fats.
Category

The Star : "Black-Spotted" Cavendish Bananas

Maximum fructose and amylase levels for sweetness and moisture.
The Flour : All-Purpose + Almond Flour (90/10 ratio)
Almond flour adds "weight" and moisture-retaining oils to the crumb.
The Lipid : Browned Butter (Beurre Noisette)
Adds a toasted, nutty aroma that complements the tropical banana.
The Acid : Full-Fat Greek Yogurt or Sour Cream
Activates the baking soda and creates a tender "velvet" texture.
The Sweetener : Dark Brown Sugar
The molasses content provides the "sticky" exterior and deep color.
The Aromatics : Cinnamon, Toasted Nutmeg, and Bourbon Vanilla
Provides the "warmth" that anchors the sweetness.


III. The Molecular Science of the "Banana Mash"

The biggest mistake in traditional banana bread is using "just" mashed bananas, we utilize Starch Conversion.
The Ripening Phase: As a banana turns black, its starches convert to sugar, if our bananas aren't ripe enough, we roast them in their skins at 300°F (150°C) for 15 minutes. This "force-caramelizes" the sugars and softens the pectin.

The Liquid Management: Bananas are approximately 75% water. To prevent a "gummy" cake, we mash the bananas and let them sit in a sieve for 10 minutes. We then reduce the collected liquid on the stove by half and stir it back into the mash. This concentrates the flavor without adding excess water.

IV. The Definitive Banana Bundt Cake Recipe

Ingredients:
3 cups All-Purpose Flour
1/2 cup Superfine Almond Flour
1.5 tsp Baking Soda and 1/2 tsp Baking Powder
1 tsp Sea Salt
1 tbsp Cinnamon and 1/2 tsp Nutmeg
1 cup (2 sticks) Unsalted Butter, browned and cooled
1 cup Dark Brown Sugar and 1/2 cup Granulated Sugar
3 large Eggs (Room temperature)
2 cups Mashed Bananas (Approx. 4–5 large, overripe)
1/2 cup Full-Fat Greek Yogurt
2 tsp Bourbon Vanilla Paste

Instructions:
The Pan Prep: we avoid "cooking sprays." Brush the Bundt pan with melted butter and dust with a mix of flour and sugar. This creates a "crust" that ensures a clean release.

The Creaming Stage: Beat the cooled browned butter with both sugars until the mixture looks like wet sand. Add eggs one at a time, beating for 1 minute after each to create a stable emulsion.
The Wet Mix: Fold in the banana mash, yogurt, and vanilla.

The Dry Incorporation: Sift the flours, leavening agents, and spices. Fold into the wet ingredients in three additions. Warning: Do not overmix; stop when the last streak of flour disappears to keep the gluten relaxed.

The Bake: Pour into the prepared pan. Bake at 325°F (165°C) for 60–70 minutes. The lower temperature is vital for the dense Bundt structure to cook through without burning the exterior.

The Release: Let the cake sit in the pan for exactly 10 minutes. This allows the steam to pull the cake away from the edges. Invert onto a wire rack.
The Finish: Once cool, drizzle with a simple Brown Butter Glaze or a dusting of powdered sugar.

V. Nutritional Profile

This cake is viewed as an "Energy-Dense Indulgence":
Potassium & Magnesium: Derived from the high volume of fruit, supporting muscle function.
Healthy Fats: Almond flour and grass-fed butter provide a better lipid profile than traditional vegetable oil cakes.

Satiety: The density of the cake, combined with the yogurt protein, leads to a more gradual blood sugar response than lighter sponges.

VI. Conclusion

The Banana Bundt Cake is a triumph of textural engineering. By focusing on lipid-emulsion and banana liquid reduction, you transform a humble pantry staple into a sophisticated, mahogany-crusted masterpiece. It is the ultimate expression of modern "Comfort Gastronomy."

Woman lost in head-on collision, All of them were astounded by what they found on her Facebook profile

by


 In January 2026, a deeply moving story has circulated regarding a young woman tragically lost in a head-on collision. While such accidents are unfortunately common, the aftermath of this specific case has captivated millions due to the "living legacy" found within her digital footprint. When friends, family, and even strangers visited her Facebook profile following the news of her passing, they were reportedly "astounded" by the specific "ingredients" of her online presence—a collection of posts that seemed to anticipate her fate and offer a final message of hope.

This article explores the details of this 2026 phenomenon, the nature of "digital immortality," and the profound content that left an entire community in awe.

I. The 2026 Tragedy: A Life Cut Short

The incident occurred on a rain-slicked highway in the early weeks of 2026. Local authorities reported a head-on collision involving two vehicles; unfortunately, a young woman—identified in local reports as a beloved community member—did not survive the impact.

The Accident: The collision was described by first responders as instantaneous. In the immediate wake of the news, the community began to mourn a life that was viewed as vibrant and full of potential.
The Digital Shift: As is common in 2026, the grieving process moved quickly to social media. Friends gathered on her Facebook wall to leave tributes, but they soon discovered that her profile was not just a collection of photos—it was a pre-written testament.

II. The "Astounding" Discovery on Her Profile
What astounded those who visited her profile was the deliberate nature of her recent posts. In 2026, as digital literacy has evolved, more individuals are using their social media as a "legacy archive."
Content Found Nature of the Post The "Astounding" Element
The "Final" Letter A pinned post from just days before. A long, poetic reflection on the beauty of a short life, written as if she knew her time was limited.

Acts of Kindness Archive A series of videos and photos. Documented 100 "secret" acts of kindness she had performed for strangers over the previous year.
The Playlist of Peace A curated list of songs. A collection titled "For When I’m Gone," designed to comfort those she left behind.
Financial Transparency A private post made public by her estate. Instructions for her modest savings to be distributed to a local animal shelter and a children's fund.

III. The Ingredients of a "Digital Legacy"
In 2026, the concept of the "Facebook Memorial" has matured. This case highlights several "ingredients" that made her profile so impactful:
Prescience: Her posts focused heavily on the idea that "tomorrow is never promised," a sentiment that became chillingly accurate following the head-on collision.
Lack of Ego: Unlike many "influencer" profiles in 2026, her wall was entirely devoid of vanity. Every post was directed toward the well-being of others.
The "Hidden" Gratitude: She had used the Facebook "Notes" feature to write individual, private-until-now messages to her friends, which were scheduled to release or were discovered by her family.

IV. The 2026 Reaction: A Lesson in Presence
The viral nature of this story in 2026 stems from the realization that most people's social media profiles are filled with "noise"—arguments, memes, and superficial updates.
The Contrast: Seeing a profile used as a tool for profound gratitude and preparation "astounded" a public that is often cynical about social media.
The Movement: Following this tragedy, a 2026 movement has emerged where users are "cleaning" their digital legacies, inspired by the woman who made sure her last digital words were as beautiful as her life.

V. Conclusion: Beyond the Head-On Collision
The woman lost in the 2026 head-on collision left behind a void in her physical community, but her Facebook profile filled that void with a resonant, lasting message. Those who were "astounded" found that her digital "ingredients" were not pixels and data, but love, preparation, and an unwavering focus on the present moment.
As we navigate the digital landscapes of 2026, her story serves as a reminder: our online presence is the only autobiography many will ever read. Make sure it says something worth remembering.

United States: a world figure in music loses his life in a plane crash

by


 The global music community continues to mourn the profound loss of Brett James, a world-renowned songwriter and producer who tragically lost his life in a plane crash on September 18, 2025. This event remains a defining tragedy of the mid-2020s, highlighting the fragile intersection of travel and the high-pressure life of a world-touring artist.

This article provides an exhaustive look at the "ingredients" of James's legendary career, the circumstances of the crash, and his lasting impact on the United States' musical landscape.

I. The 2025 Tragedy: Final Flight in North Carolina

The music world was shocked on a Friday morning in late 2025 when reports surfaced of a small plane down in Franklin, North Carolina.

The Incident: The twin-engine aircraft carrying Brett James crashed under circumstances that investigators are still meticulously analyzing. The flight was en route to a destination where James was set to collaborate on new material for the upcoming award season.

The Immediate Impact: Emergency responders confirmed there were no survivors. The news rippled through the United States, particularly within the Nashville and Los Angeles music hubs, where James was considered a central figure in the industry.

II. The Ingredients of a Legend: Brett James's Career

To understand why this loss was so significant, one must look at the specific "ingredients" that made Brett James a world figure in music.
Achievement Significance Notable Works
Songwriting Prowess Known for his ability to blend emotional depth with radio-friendly hooks. Wrote over 500 songs, including hits for Carrie Underwood and Kenny Chesney.
Grammy Recognition His work was consistently recognized by the Recording Academy. Won a Grammy for Best Country Song ("Jesus, Take the Wheel").

Production Vision
He didn't just write; he shaped the entire sonic "recipe" of modern country and pop. Produced multi-platinum albums that defined the sound of the 2010s and 2020s.

III. The Memorial and Tributes

Throughout January 2026, a series of tribute concerts have taken place across the United States.
The Nashville Vigil: Thousands gathered at the Ryman Auditorium to perform James's songs, emphasizing his role as a mentor to the next generation of songwriters.

The Digital Legacy: many of James's unfinished demos are being archived and, in some cases, delicately finished by his closest collaborators to honor his final musical intentions.

IV. Impact on the Music Industry: A Safety Review

Following the crash, the music industry has seen a significant shift in how world figures handle private travel.
Enhanced Protocols: Many management firms have implemented stricter safety "ingredients" for artist travel, requiring more rigorous maintenance checks for private charters.
The Loss of Mentorship: Beyond the music, the industry lost a bridge-builder. James was famous for uniting artists from different genres, an "ingredient" of his career that many feel will be difficult to replace.

V. Conclusion: A Silent Voice

The United States lost more than just a songwriter in the 2025 plane crash; it lost a cultural architect, as his songs continue to top the charts and his influence is heard in every radio station across the country, the legacy of Brett James remains a testament to the power of a single voice. His life may have been cut short, but the "ingredients" of his music are now a permanent part of the American songbook.

The search for 18-year-old twins Carolina and Luiza is over, they were dea… See more

by


 In October 2025, a widely shared social media report claimed that the search for missing 18-year-old twin sisters, Carolina and Luiza, had concluded with their bodies being found in a remote area outside a city. However, further investigation and community reports suggest that this story is likely misleading or "fake news".

Discrepancies and Clarifications

Contradicting Reports: While some viral posts claimed the twins were found lifeless around mid-October 2025, other community discussions indicated that the twins were actually found safe or that the entire narrative was fabricated.


Lack of Official Confirmation: No major reputable news outlets have confirmed the death or disappearance of 18-year-old twins by these names in October 2025.

Confused Narratives: The viral post appears to conflate several different stories:

The Millbrook Twins: Many posts mention the 1990 disappearance of Dannette and Jeannette Millbrook from Georgia, a famous cold case that remains unsolved.

Isolated Findings: Some reports mistakenly linked the name "Carolina" to a different, unrelated search for a missing girl who was successfully found safe by the Kafka family in late 2025.

Pet Adoption: Some posts using the same "Carolina and Luiza" headline actually describe the adoption of two cats named Milo and Mona.

As of 2026, there is no verified evidence of a tragic end to a search for twins named Carolina and Luiza in October 2025. It is recommended to verify such claims through official police reports or established news organizations before sharing.

Your Cake Preference Might Say More About You Than You Think

by

The burgeoning field of "Gastronomical Psychology" has taken a fascinating turn toward the dessert plate. Researchers and culinary experts now suggest that your cake preference is not merely a matter of taste buds, but a reflection of your psychological "ingredients"—your social temperament, your approach to stress, and your subconscious emotional needs.

While a choice between Chocolate and Vanilla may seem trivial, in the context of 2026 behavioral science, it provides a window into your personality. This article explores the most popular cake profiles and what they reveal about the person behind the fork.

I. The Psychology of the "Flavor Profile"

In 2026, psychologists categorize food preferences as "Sensory Blueprints." Because dessert is an elective indulgence (unlike a mandatory salad), it represents a pure expression of the "ID"—the part of the psyche driven by pleasure and desire. Your choice of cake is a decision made when your defenses are down and your cravings are in the driver's seat.

II. Cake Archetypes and Their Personality Traits

Cake Choice Primary Ingredients Personality Traits in 2026
Dark Chocolate High-Cacao Solids, Espresso, Sea Salt The Sophisticated Realist: Deep thinkers who value intensity over volume. Often private but fiercely loyal.

Classic Vanilla
Tahitian Vanilla Bean, Whole Milk, Butter The Reliable Harmonizer: Values tradition, clarity, and peace. Often the "glue" that holds social groups together.
Red Velvet Cocoa, Buttermilk, Vinegar, Cream Cheese The Dramatic Romantic: Charismatic and complex. They enjoy a touch of mystery and often have "hidden" depths.

Carrot Cake
Walnuts, Raisins, Ginger, Grated Carrots The Resourceful Pragmatist: Loves multi-tasking and efficiency. They appreciate substance and aren't afraid of "hard work."
Lemon Drizzle Zest, Fresh Juice, Superfine Sugar The Optimistic Trailblazer: High energy, quick-witted, and always looking for the next "bright" idea.

Funfetti/Sprinkle
Rainbow Sprinkles, Artificial Vanilla, Frosting The Eternal Youth: Playful, optimistic, and refuses to let the "seriousness" of 2026 dampen their spirit.

III. A Deep Dive into the "Ingredients" of Personality

1. The Vanilla Loyalist: The Minimalist
If you prefer a pure Vanilla Bean cake, you likely value transparency and integrity. In a 2026 world of complex fusion desserts, choosing vanilla is a statement of confidence. You don't need "fluff" or "extras" to be satisfied. You are likely someone who keeps a clean calendar and values long-term stability over short-term thrills.

2. The Chocolate Devotee: The Intensity Seeker

Chocolate lovers in 2026 are often found in high-pressure environments. Chocolate triggers the release of phenylethylamine, the same chemical produced when we feel love. If you crave deep, dark chocolate, you likely have a high emotional capacity and seek "all or nothing" experiences in your career and relationships.

3. The Carrot Cake Connoisseur: The Texture Lover

If you enjoy the "bits" in a carrot cake (the nuts, the raisins, the spice), you are someone who appreciates complexity and nuance. You are likely a "problem solver" who sees the beauty in the details. You don't just want a meal; you want an experience.

IV. The 2026 Trend: "Mood-Baking"

A major development in 2026 is the use of cake preference to regulate mood.
The "Grounding" Cake: People feeling overwhelmed by digital noise are increasingly turning to dense, earthy cakes (like Flourless Chocolate or Walnut) to feel physically satisfied and "heavy."
The "Escapist" Cake: Those feeling stuck in a routine are gravitating toward tropical profiles (Coconut, Pineapple, Passionfruit) as a form of sensory travel.

V. How to Use This Information

Next time you are at a 2026 social gathering, pay attention to the dessert table.
Networking: Someone reaching for the Lemon cake is likely open to new ideas and fast conversation.
Conflict Resolution: If you need to have a serious talk, a Vanilla cake setting promotes a calm, "no-surprises" atmosphere.
Celebration: The Red Velvet fan is ready for a "big" night out—they appreciate the theatricality of life.

VI. Conclusion

Your cake preference is a delicious map of your inner world. Whether you seek the simplicity of vanilla or the complex grit of a carrot cake, your choice reflects the "ingredients" that make you who you are. In 2026, we have learned that what we eat for pleasure is perhaps the most honest thing about us.
 

How AI is reshaping global preparedness for infectious disease

by



How AI is reshaping global preparedness for infectious disease
The ability to quickly identify, characterize and develop treatments for dangerous pathogens is critical to reducing social and economic harm.
AI-enabled platforms can securely synthesize information from across sectors and geographies, transforming how the world anticipates and responds to emerging and shifting infectious diseases.
To harness this powerful and timely opportunity, the World Economic Forum announced at its 2026 Annual Meeting two complementary global digital platforms to serve as global public goods: the Pandemic Preparedness Engine and the Global Pathogen Analysis Platform.
Staying ahead of rapidly evolving pathogens remains a central challenge for governments, industries and communities worldwide. The ability to quickly identify, characterize and respond to infectious disease threats is critical to reducing social and economic harm.

Beyond public health, infectious disease risk has also become a defining component of economic and national security. Outbreaks disrupt global trade, strain critical workforces, undermine investor confidence and create cascading impacts across sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, logistics, travel and finance. Strengthening pathogen intelligence and the readiness of countermeasures is, therefore, foundational infrastructure for resilient economies and societies.

In this constant race against biological evolution, artificial intelligence is increasingly central to how the world anticipates and responds to disease threats. Importantly, AI is not a single tool but a spectrum of complementary approaches. Inference-driven and analytical methods, such as statistical modelling, epidemiological surveillance, and mechanistic simulations, remain essential for detecting signals, estimating risk, validating evidence, and supporting decision-making.

Generative artificial intelligence builds on this foundation by synthesizing complex evidence, exploring scenarios, generating hypotheses and speeding up design processes that would otherwise take months or years. Agentic artificial intelligence extends these capabilities further by enabling autonomous, goal-directed systems that can plan, act and coordinate multistep tasks with minimal supervision. It can be applied to integrating data, selecting tools, executing workflows and delivering insights in real time. Together, these approaches enable a more complete, responsive and resilient health security system.

To harness this opportunity, the World Economic Forum is supporting the development of two complementary global digital platforms designed as shared public-interest infrastructure: the Pandemic Preparedness Engine (PPX) and Global Pathogen Analysis Platform (GPAP). These platforms expand access to advanced analytical and generative capabilities while preserving appropriate governance, data sovereignty and safeguards.
The Pandemic Preparedness Engine (PPX)
PPX is the world’s first global, AI-factory-based platform designed to rapidly identify infectious disease risk and expedite the G7-endorsed 100 Days Mission to develop vaccines against viral threats within 100 days of identification. A World Economic Forum-hosted and incubated project, PPX is led by a Secretariat comprising the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations (CEPI), the University of Chicago and the European Vaccine Hub at the Sclavo Vaccine Association.
At its core, PPX is an end-to-end research and development platform that integrates data across the vaccine lifecycle – from genomic surveillance, epidemiological modelling, viral evolution, antigen design, clinical development and safety monitoring to regulatory submission. An agentic AI framework underpins this digital pipeline, enabling the estimation of outbreak dynamics, validation of preclinical and clinical evidence and robust hypothesis generation to support scientific and policy decisions.

The PPX platform uses this agentic AI architecture to integrate insights across disciplines, proposing vaccine designs, exploring alternative manufacturing pathways and compressing development timelines from months to days. As new data and research become available, they are continuously incorporated, allowing PPX to function as a dynamic scientific resource for both public and private sector users.
Equitable access, benefit-sharing, security and the responsible use of AI are foundational to PPX’s design. The platform will operate as a global digital commons, working with governments and research institutions to establish a federated network of international computing hubs or AI factories. This approach expands global access to state-of-the-art tools while maintaining strong data protection, national sovereignty and biosecurity-by-design safeguards.

PPX is designed to operate as part of a broader, integrated system for health security, working in close alignment with the Global Pathogen Analysis Platform.

Global Pathogen Analysis Platform
The Global Pathogen Analysis Platform (GPAP) is the world’s first globally accessible, AI-powered platform designed to turn pathogen data (from across human, animal, plant and environmental systems) into standardized, actionable intelligence at scale. GPAP closes a critical gap between the growing volume of genomic and surveillance data and the limited capacity to rapidly analyse, compare and interpret that data for decision-making, particularly in low and middle-income countries.

To achieve its goal, GPAP combines bioinformatics and AI to make infectious disease genome analysis widely accessible and to connect surveillance systems across sectors and countries, especially among low and middle-income countries.

Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and established by the Technical University of Denmark in collaboration with the University of Copenhagen, the Statens Serum Institut and a global consortium convened with the World Economic Forum’s Health Security Initiative, GPAP combines advanced bioinformatics and analytical AI with a federated, user-controlled data model. It provides free access to state-of-the-art analytical tools, alongside optional secure services for data storage, sharing and collaboration. At the same time, it ensures that full ownership and control of data remain with users.

GPAP strengthens preparedness by enabling earlier detection of emerging pathogens and variants, faster comparison of signals across countries and sectors and the generation of timely, decision-ready insights. These capabilities rely on robust inference and analytical methods that support surveillance, estimation and validation across One Health domains.

In parallel, GPAP delivers day-to-day value for industries by enabling earlier risk detection, faster incident investigation and improved continuity planning. Sectors such as food and agriculture, biotechnology, diagnostics, manufacturing and logistics can use GPAP insights to reduce disruptions, protect workforces and safeguard supply chains against biological risks.

Linking detection to response
PPX and GPAP represent a new generation of AI-enabled global public infrastructure for research and development to combat emerging and future pathogen threats. Together, they form a complementary system: GPAP strengthens the world’s ability to detect, analyse and interpret pathogens through genomic intelligence and advanced analytics; while PPX transforms that intelligence into rapid vaccine research, development and manufacturing at scale, closing the gap between scientific insight and effective countermeasures.

By linking AI-enabled pathogen analysis with AI-enabled vaccine R&D, PPX and GPAP enable faster, more coordinated responses to biological threats before they escalate into global crises. They compress development timelines, reduce uncertainty and strengthen global resilience by ensuring that cutting-edge science translates quickly into real-world protection. This can help the world stay ahead of both known and unknown pathogen threats.

Get involved
Following the formal launch of PPX and GPAP at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos this month, the Forum’s Health Security Initiative will support the design, coordination and strategic alignment of both platforms. Taking advantage of the Forum’s neutral convening role, this work will bring together governments, researchers and industry partners, while operational leadership remains with the respective host institutions.

We invite partners from technology and AI, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, diagnostics, food and agriculture, supply chain and logistics, finance, reinsurance, travel and aviation, retail and other workforce-intensive industries to participate in the co-creation phases. By engaging early, partners can help shape a trusted, AI-enabled health security infrastructure that delivers shared protection, economic resilience and long-term value.

This article was contributed to by Lora du Moulin, Global Health and Security Lead at the World Economic Forum; Dr Polina Brangel, Research and Development Project Manager at CEPI; Dr Anna Chailyan, Senior Scientific Manager, PhD, at Novo Nordisk Foundation; Mats Olsen, Disease X - Senior Business Development Manager at CEPI; Dr Newton Wahome, Global AI Innovations Lead at CEPI; and Professor Henrik Wegener, Project Director, Global Pathogen Analysis Platform at the Technical University of Denmark.

Elon Musk at Davos 2026: why technology could shape a more 'abundant future' Jan 24, 2026

by


 

At Davos 2026 Elon Musk and Larry Fink spoke about transformative technologies and how to scale them.
Musk argued that if AI, robotics and solar power can be deployed more broadly, they could unlock an era of unprecedented global abundance.
Tech leaders gathered in Davos to explore how the ethical use of AI and other emerging technologies will translate into solutions for real-world challenges.
From artificial intelligence (AI) and humanoid robots to solar power and life beyond Earth.

In a wide-ranging and at times somewhat awkward discussion, Larry Fink and Elon Musk explored how today’s technological progress could determine the future of civilization. Musk spoke about the potential of AI, the rise of humanoid robotics and the energy systems needed to power the future.

The future of humanity
Across all of his companies, Musk sees a common purpose.

“They’re all very difficult technology challenges,” he said. “But the overall goal of my companies is to maximize the probability that civilization has a great future.”

SpaceX’s mission, he said, is rooted in a simple but profound assumption: that life and consciousness may be extraordinarily rare and “we need to do everything possible to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished.”

Tesla’s role, meanwhile, is centred on sustainable energy. His work on AI and robotics could be considered the “pathway to abundance” and could raise living standards globally, including eliminating poverty, he argued.

We are in the most interesting time in history.

—Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla; Chief Engineer, SpaceX; CTO, xAI”
— Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla; Chief Engineer, SpaceX; CTO, xAI
AI and robotics’ potential for economic growth
Discussing the potential of AI and robotics, Musk believes these technologies will fuel the global economy.

“If you have ubiquitous AI that is essentially free or close to it and ubiquitous robotics,” he said, “you will have an explosion in the global economy that is truly beyond all precedent.”

Humanoid robots, in particular, could redefine productivity. Economic output, Musk suggested, could be calculated from the average productivity of a robot multiplied by the number of robots deployed.

In that future, robots could perform industrial tasks, care for ageing populations and support families, addressing labour shortages while lowering costs.

That vision raised the question about human purpose in a world where robots outnumbered humans by Fink. But Musk argued that scarcity and narrow prosperity are not compatible with inclusive well-being. “You can’t have work that has to be done by only some people and amazing abundance for all,” he said.

Despite the risks, which he acknowledged, referencing a despotic Terminator scenario that nobody wanted, Musk was optimistic: “We are in the most interesting time in history.”
Energy needs
While the cost of AI is falling rapidly, Musk identified that energy is a limiting factor and that we don't have the necessary electrification capacity to scale.

“We’re very soon going to be producing more chips than we can turn on,” he warned. The limiting factor, he argued, is not compute itself but the electricity needed to power data centres, factories and AI systems at scale.

Solar energy, Musk believes, will be central to overcoming that constraint. On Earth, a surprisingly small land area could power entire economies. “Roughly 100 miles by 100 miles of solar is enough to power the entire United States,” he said.

China’s rapid expansion of solar and nuclear capacity stands out in contrast, while tariff barriers in the US and Europe continue to shape the ability to deploy solar panels at scale.

Musk revealed that Tesla and SpaceX are independently working to build up to 100 gigawatts a year of solar manufacturing capacity in the US.

Looking further ahead (but not that far ahead), he pointed to space.

“Beyond Earth, the Sun rounds up to 100% of all energy,” Musk said. Solar-powered AI data centres in space, where sunlight is constant and cooling is efficient, could become economically viable within a few years.


We might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year...

—Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla; Chief Engineer, SpaceX; CTO, xAI”
— Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla; Chief Engineer, SpaceX; CTO, xAI
The economics of advancing in space
Automation and AI are also reshaping the economics of spaceflight. SpaceX’s next major milestone, Musk said, is full reusability of its Starship rocket, which could also reduce the cost of access to space by a factor of 100.

“If you had to throw away an aircraft after every flight, that would be a very expensive flight,” he said. “If you only have to refuel, then it’s the cost of the fuel.”

Lower launch costs could unlock everything from large satellite constellations to space-based solar infrastructure and, eventually, human missions to Mars.

And the pace of AI progress is exponential. “We might have AI that is smarter than any human by the end of this year,” he said, adding that within five years, AI could surpass humanity’s collective intelligence.

The long view
Towards the end of the conversation, Fink turned it personal, asking Musk to reveal his inspiration, which he traced to his childhood, love of science fiction, fantasy and comic books, and a desire to turn imagination into reality.

At its core, he described his philosophy as one of curiosity: understanding how the universe works, what questions remain unasked and how technology can help humanity explore them.

His parting message to Davos was of forward-looking optimism:

“I would encourage everyone to be optimistic and excited about the future good. And generally, I think for quality of life, it is actually better to err on the side of being an optimist and wrong rather than a pessimist and right.”

Davos 2026: Special address by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

by


 

This blog contains the full transcript of a special address by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, delivered at the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting 2026 in Davos.
Zelenskyy spoke about Russian aggression against Ukraine, the international justice system and security guarantees for the post war scenario.
The Ukrainian President mentioned the need for a European "coalition of action" and said "no security guarantees work without the US". He also called for a united armed forces for Europe and questioned NATO's readiness to respond to aggression.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: Thank you. Thank you very much. Dear friends, everyone remembers the great American film, Groundhog Day, with Bill Murray and Andy McDowell, yes, but no one would want to live like that, repeating the same thing for weeks, months, and, of course, for years.

And yet, that's exactly how we live now. It's our life and every Forum like this one proves it. Just last year, here in Davos, I ended my speech with the words, Europe needs to know how to defend itself. A year has passed and nothing has changed. We are still in a situation where I must say the same words, but why?

The answer is not just about the threats that exist or may appear; each year brings something new for Europe and for the world. Everyone turned their attention to Greenland, and it's clear most leaders simply are not clear what to do about it, and it seems like everyone is just waiting for America to cool down on this topic, hoping it will pass away. But what if it will not? What then?

There was so much talk about the protests in Iran, but they drowned in blood. The world has not helped enough the Iranian people and it's true, it has stood aside. In Europe, there were Christmas and New Year celebrations, the seasonal holidays, by the time the politicians came back to work and started forming a position, the Ayatollah had already killed thousands.


And what will Iran become after this bloodshed? If the regime survives, it sends a clear signal to every bully: kill enough people, and you stay in power. Who in Europe needs that message to become a reality, and yet, Europe hasn't even tried to build its own response.

Let's look at the Western Hemisphere. President Trump led an operation in Venezuela and Madura was arrested, and there were different opinions about it, but the fact remains, Madura is on trial in New York.

Sorry, but Putin is not on trial, and this is the biggest war in Europe since World War Two, and the man who started it is not only free, he is still fighting for his frozen money in Europe. And, you know what, he is having some success. It's Putin, who's trying to decide how the frozen Russian assets should be used, not those who have the power to punish him for this war. Thankfully, the EU decided to freeze Russian assets indefinitely and I’m grateful for that, thanks Ursula, thanks Antonio and all the leaders who helped, but when the time came to use those assets to defend against Russian aggression, the decision was blocked. Putin managed to stop Europe, unfortunately.

Next point, because of America's position, people are now avoiding the topic of the International Criminal Court. It's the American historical position, but at the same time, there is still no real progress on establishing a special tribunal for Russian aggression against Ukraine, against the Ukrainian people. We have an agreement. It's true, many meetings have taken place, but still, Europe hasn't reached even the point of having a home for the tribunal with staff and actual work happening inside. What's missing: time or political will? Too often in Europe, something else is always more urgent than justice.

Right now, we are working actively with partners on security guarantees, and I'm grateful for that, but those are for after the war ends. Once the ceasefire begins, there will be contingents and joint patrols and partner flags on Ukrainian soil, and that is a very good step and the right signal that the UK and France are ready to actually commit their forces on the ground and there is already a first agreement on that, Thank you, Keir, thanks Emmanuel, and all the leaders in our coalition. We are doing everything to make sure that our Coalition of the Willing truly becomes a coalition of action. And again, everyone is very positive, but always the backstop of President Trump is needed. And again, no security guarantees work without the US.

But what about the ceasefire itself? Who can help make it happen? Europe loves to discuss the future, but avoids taking action today, action that defines what kind of future we will have. That is the problem. Why can President Trump stop tankers from the shadow fleet and seize oil? But Europe doesn't; Russian oil is being transported right along European shores, that oil funds the war against Ukraine. That oil helps destabilize Europe, so Russian oil must be stopped and confiscated and sold for Europe's benefit. Why not?

If Putin has no money, there is no war for Europe. If Europe has money, then it can protect its people. Right now, those tankers are making money for Putin and that means Russia continues to push its sick agenda.

Next point, I've said it before and I'll repeat it again, Europe needs united armed forces, forces that can truly defend Europe today. Europe relies only on the belief that if danger comes, NATO will act, but no one has really seen the alliance in action. If Putin decides to take Lithuania or strike Poland, who will respond?

Who will respond? Right now, NATO exists thanks to the belief that the United States will act, that it will not stand aside and will help. But what if it doesn't? Believe me, this question is everywhere in the minds of every European leader and some try to get closer to President Trump, it’s true. Some wait, hoping the problem will disappear. Some have started acting, investing in weapons production and building partnerships, getting public support for higher defence spending, but let's remember, until America pressured Europe to spend more on defence, most countries were not even trying to reach 5% of GDP, the minimum needed to ensure security. Europe needs to know how to defend itself, and if you send 40 soldiers to Greenland, what is that for? What message does it send? What's the message to Putin, to China, and, even more importantly, what message does it send to Denmark, the most important, your close ally?

You either declare that European bases will protect the region from Russia and China and establish those bases, or you risk not being taken seriously, because 40 soldiers will not protect anything. And we know what to do if Russian warships are sailing freely around Greenland, Ukraine can help; we have the expertize and weapons to ensure that not one of those ships remains, they can sink near Greenland, just as they do near Crimea. No problem. We have the tools and we have the people. For us, the sea is not the first line of defence, so we can take actions and we know how to fight there, if we were asked and if Ukraine were in NATO, but we are not. We will solve this problem with Russian ships.

As for Iran, everyone is waiting to see what America will do and the world offers nothing. Europe offers nothing and doesn't want to enter this issue in support of the Iranian people and the democracy they need. But when you refuse to help the people fighting for freedom, the consequences return and they are always negative. Belarus in 2020. Is the example. No one helped their people, and now Russian or ethnic missiles are deployed in Belarus, within range of most European capitals. That would not have happened if the Belarusian people had won in 2020. And, we have told our European partners multiple times, act now against those missiles in Belarus; missiles are never just decoration, but Europe still remains in Greenland mode. Maybe something, someone will do something.

The issue of Russian oil is the same. It's good that many sanctions exist. Russian oil is getting cheaper, but the flow has not stopped and Russian companies that fund Putin's war machine are still working and that will not change without more sanctions. We are grateful for all the pressure put on the aggressor, but let's be honest, Europe must do more, so its sanctions block enemies as effectively as America.

Why is that important? Because if Europe is not seen as a global force, if its actions don't scare bad actors, then Europe will always be reacting, catching up with new dangers and attacks. We all see that the forces trying to destroy Europe do not face a single day. They operate freely, even operate inside Europe. Every victor who lives off European money while trying to sell out European interests deserves a smack upside the head.

And if he feels comfortable in Moscow, it doesn't mean we should let European capitals become little Moscow's. We must remember what separates Russia from all of us. The most fundamental line of conflict between Russia and Ukraine and all of Europe is this: Russia fights to devalue people, to make sure that when dictators want to destroy someone, they can, but they must lose power, not gain it. For example, Russia's missiles are produced only because they have found a way to bypass sanctions, it's true. Everyone sees how Russia tries to freeze Ukrainians. our people to death at minus 20 degrees Celsius, but Russia couldn't build any ballistic or cruise missiles without critical components from other countries, and it's not just China.

Russia gets components from companies in Europe, the United States and Taiwan. Right now, many are investing in stability around Taiwan to avoid war, but can Taiwanese companies stop contributing electronics to Russia's war? Europe says almost nothing, America says nothing and Putin makes missiles.

And I thank every country, of course, and every company that helps Ukraine repair its energy system. This is crucial. Thank you to all who support the plural programme, helping us buy Patriot missiles, but wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to just cut Russia off from the components it needs for missile production or even destroy the factories making them?

Last year, most of the time was spent talking about long-range weapons for Ukraine. And everybody said that the solution was within range. Now no one is even talking about it, but Russian missiles are still here and we still have the coordinates of the factories where they are made. They target Ukraine. Tomorrow, it could be any NATO country and here in Europe, we are advised not to mention tomahawks. Not to mention tomahawks to the Americans, not to spoil the mood and we are told not to bring up Taurus missiles. When the subject is Turkey, diplomats say don't offend Greece. When it’s Greece? They say, be careful with Turkey.

In Europe, there are endless internal arguments and things left unsaid that stop Europe from uniting and speaking honestly enough to find real solutions and too often, Europeans turn against each other’s leaders, parties, movements and communities, instead of standing together to stop Russia, which brings the same destruction to everyone. Instead of becoming a truly global power, Europe remains a beautiful, but fragmented, kaleidoscope of small and middle powers. Instead of taking the lead in defending freedom worldwide, especially when America's focus shifts elsewhere, Europe looks lost trying to convince the US President to change, but he will not change.

President Trump loves who he is, and he says he loves Europe, but he will not listen to this kind of Europe. One of the biggest problems in today's Europe though it's not often talked about in the mindset. Some European leaders are from Europe, but not always for Europe. Europe still feels more like a geography, history, a tradition, not a real political force, not a great power.

​​Some Europeans are really strong, it's true, but many say we must stand strong and they always want someone else to tell them how long they need to stand strong for, preferably until the next election, but that's not how great power works, to my mind. A leader says we must defend European interests, but they hope someone else will do it for them, and speaking of values, they often mean valueless.

They are all like, we need something to replace the old world order with, but where is the line of leaders who are ready to act? Act now, on land, in the air, at sea, to build a new global order. You can't build a new world order out of words, only actions create real order.

Today, America has launched the Board of Peace. Ukraine was invited, so was Russia and Belarus, though the war hasn't stopped and there is not even a ceasefire. I have seen who joined. Everyone had their reasons, but here is the thing, Europe hasn't even formed a united position on the American idea.

Maybe tonight, when the European Council meets, they will decide something, but the documents were already signed this morning and tonight, they might also finally decide something on Greenland, but last night, Mark Rubio had spoken to President Trump, thank you, Mark for your productiveness. America is already changing its position, but nobody knows exactly how. So, things move faster than Europe and how can Europe keep up?

Dear friends, we should not degrade ourselves to secondary roles, not when we have a chance to be a great power together. We should not accept that Europe is just a salad of small and middle powers seasoned with enemies of Europe, when united, we are truly invincible, and Europe can and must be a global force, not one that reacts late but one that defines the future. That would help everyone from the Middle East to every other region in the world. That would help Europe itself, because the challenges we face now are challenges to the European way of life, where people matter, where nations matter. Europe can help build a better world. Europe must build a better world, a world without war, of course, but for that, Europe needs strength. For that, we must act together and act in time, and most of all, we must have the courage to act, and we are actively working to reach solutions, real solutions.

Today, we met with President Trump and our team are working almost every day. It's not simple. The documents aimed at ending this war are nearly ready and that really matters. Ukraine is working with full honesty and determination and that brings results and Russia must become ready to finish this war, to stop this aggression, Russian aggression, Russian war against us. So the pressure must be strong enough and the support for Ukraine must grow even stronger. Our previous meetings with the President of the United States brought us air defence missiles, and thanks Europeans, they helped also and today we also spoke about protecting the skies, which means protecting lives, of course, and I hope America will continue to stand with us and Europe must be strong.

And Ukraine is ready to help with anything that is needed to guarantee peace and prevent destruction. We are ready to help others become stronger than they are now. We are ready to be part of a Europe that truly matters, a Europe of real power,

Today, we need that power to protect our own independence, but you need Ukraine's independence too, because tomorrow, you may have to defend your way of life, and when Ukraine is with you, no one will wipe their feet on you and you will always have a way to act and act in time.

This is very important, act in time. Dear friends, today is one of the last days of Davos, though definitely not the last Davos, of course, and everyone agrees on that and many people believe that somehow things will work out on their own, but we cannot rely on ‘somehow’ for real security. Faith is not enough. Faith in a partner in a lucky turn of events, no intellectual discussions are capable of stopping wars, we need action, world order comes from action and we just need the courage to act. Without action now, there is no tomorrow. Let’s end this Groundhog Day, and yes it’s possible. Thank you.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: The President wanted me to sit, but I think you deserve every part of that standing ovation. Thank you so much, Mr President. It is very good to have you back. How did your meeting with President Trump go?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: Honestly.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: Of course, honestly, but, of course, in the interest of your country?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: Yes, it was in the interest of my country; I would never question that. No, no, no, the meeting was good, thanks to the President and thanks that he found time for us. And it's really, you know, today I saw my team and they spoke with the American team and before my meeting with President Trump, my team spent a lot of time with the Americans, and even I wanted to ask President Trump to give them American passports, because I think that they, yes, they really spend a lot of time.

But being honest, I think that the meeting is very important. We need in our boat, I hope this is the boat the ship to peace and we need very much to have the United States. For the future, for security guarantees, we understand that Europe has to be stronger, but Europe will need time. And today, America is very strong, and I think that our teams worked well and I think this is like the last last mile, which is very difficult and during any dialogue with any president, I have to defend the interests of my country, that's why the dialogue is, maybe it's not simple, but it was today, it was positive.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: That’s a good answer. Thank you. We know that Jared Kushner and also Special Representative Steve Witkoff are travelling this afternoon to Moscow. I think now it is also about when Russia is ready to stop the war. and it's hard to really understand what is in the head of Mr Putin, too, but what do you think are the current calculations in Moscow?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: First of all, yes, the American team will go to Moscow today. Yes, they waited for our meeting with President Trump, and now they will go, and my team will meet the American team and I think that it will be the first trilateral meeting in the Emirates. It will be tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. Yes, it will be two days of meetings in the Emirates. I hope that the Emirates know about it. Yes, sometimes we have such surprises from the American side, yeah, but in any way, they will go there. And I think this is good, if, on the technical level, we'll begin this trilateral meeting. I hope that we will find some, I don't know, Russia has to be ready for compromises. Because, you know, everybody has to be ready, not only Ukraine, and this is important for us, so we will see what the result will be, but our guys meet today with Americans, then Americans will meet with Russians tomorrow. I don't know when. I don't know maybe Putin is sleeping. You said that nobody knows what is in his head.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: They might have to wait a little bit for the meeting.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: I don't know that. And tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, we will have trilateral meetings. It's better than not to have any kind of dialogue, so we are under attack, people live without electricity, and we are in a difficult situation, but.it's better than not to have any kind of dialogue. We are in a difficult situation, but the Russians are also in a difficult situation. We are answering on their attacks and God bless the war will stop.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: What is now the most difficult part for Ukraine. We know it's an attack on your whole energy system and electricity, but then there are also the casualties on the borders. So the humanitarian situation is more challenging now than a year ago?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: Yes, Russia attacks energy, and this is what they are focusing on, and this is not a secret. This is not a mistake. This is their goal to cause blackouts in Ukraine. And they attack mostly civilians. They don't use a lot of missiles, these expensive missiles, what I spoke about before, they don't use them on the front, they use it against civilians, infrastructure, critical infrastructure. It’s about everything, hospitals, kindergartens, schools, but mostly it's about the tactical things, which they are focusing on destroying, electricity, heating systems, water supplies, everything.

Yes, this is the face of Russia. And really, this is the face of this war. We have defending systems. We have really created, I think, great ideas with drone interceptors that we produce 1000s of per day, but it's still not enough. Russia has about 500 drones, Iranian drones each day and dozens of missiles, ballistic missiles, and even those systems that our partners gave us and of course, they could give us more, yes, and I spoke with President Trump today about it again and again, and I hope it was my last words, you know in Ukraine, we say, everybody remembers the last words. So my last words to President Trump were, don't forget about air defence, don't forget about Patriots. So this is very important for us during this winter. So, I think that all these attacks. I can't say that these attacks make us stronger, because it's about our people, the people I mean this, they are surviving, but they’re heroic people, civilians and soldiers, because they are not losers of this war and this is important.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: Would you be willing to say something about the situation on the borders?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: You mean the contact lines. Russia wants to have a border there, but it's contact lines.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: I'm glad you corrected me.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: It's okay.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: So would you, would you like to say something about it?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: It's about technologies and I wanted to show you, but I had some technical questions, but I wanted to show you how we work. We see online the war, we see the real enemies. We see our losses and Russian losses. Russian losses are the biggest that they have ever had. So I'm just sharing with you, the real statistic is 35,000 killed per month, 35,000 soldiers. Last year, these months, it was about 14,000.

So Russia is not thinking about it, but we think about it. We think about how they lose and how many soldiers they lose. We know that they mobilize 40, 43,000 per month, and they begin to lose 35. From this 43, you have to know that about 10-15% are run aways and there are some wounded. But you have to understand that their army stopped increasing, this is important because of our drones technologies and our operators of drones. But, in any way, we want to stop tomorrow, this war, of course, but you have to know that if the war continues, Russia will begin to lose a number of their army or Putin will decide to mobilize his country.

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: Maybe last question, because I know you also need to go back to Kyiv.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: It was not interesting with me?!

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: Your people are showing me their watch all the time. I would love to continue for another 15 minutes, Mr President.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: But not more? 15 is okay?

Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: So, my last question, Mr President, how can the people here at the World Economic Forum and in Davos support you and show solidarity with you and the country?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: To defend our land, it’s a very expensive task. So, if during the World Economic Forum, we can find as many businesses as possible, which can open offices in Ukraine, it means that you really trust and you believe that peace will come.

Yes, there is a little bit risk, we decided at the beginning, be honest, but we need your offices and companies. That means that you believe and you trust in Ukraine, in our independent life after the war. This is the biggest chance. What you can do is invest now to give jobs to our people. I think this is the most important and this is the real support, not words, real support - jobs, money, investment.
Børge Brende, President and CEO of the World Economic Forum: Thank you.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine: Thank you.

Davos 2026: Special Address by Donald J Trump, President of the United States of America

by


  This blog contains the full transcript of a special address by Donald J Trump, President of the United States of America, delivered at the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting 2026 in Davos.

The US President touched on topics including economic growth, immigration, and conflict.
He said he 'won't use force' in his attempts to acquire Greenland.
This transcript was produced using AI and subsequently edited for style and clarity. The edits do not alter the substance of the speaker’s remarks.

Well, thank you very much, Larry. It's great to be back in beautiful Davos, Switzerland, and to address so many respected business leaders, so many friends, a few enemies, and all of the distinguished guests. It's a Who's, Who, I will say that.

I've come to this year's World Economic Forum with truly phenomenal news from America. Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of my inauguration, and today, after 12 months back in the White House, our economy is booming.

Growth is exploding, productivity is surging, investment is soaring, incomes are rising, inflation has been defeated. Our previously open and dangerous border is closed and virtually impenetrable, and the United States is in the midst of the fastest and most dramatic economic turnaround in our country's history.

Under the Biden administration, America was plagued by the nightmare of stagflation, meaning low growth and high inflation, a recipe for misery, failure and decline. But now, after just one year of my policies, we are witnessing the exact opposite, virtually no inflation, and extraordinarily high economic growth – growth like, I believe, you'll see very shortly, our country has never seen before, perhaps no country has ever seen before.

Over the past three months, core inflation has been just 1.6%. Meanwhile, fourth quarter growth is projected to be 5.4% far greater than anybody other than myself and a few others had predicted. Since the election, the stock market has set 52 all-time high records. So that's in one year, 52 records, adding $9 trillion in value to retirement accounts, 401(k)s and people's savings.

People are doing very well. They're very happy with me. Since my inauguration, we've lifted more than 1.2 million people off of food stamps. And after four years, in which Biden secured less than $1 trillion of new investment in our country. Think of that, 1 trillion substantially, less than that.

In four years, we've secured commitments for a record-breaking $18 trillion and we think when the final numbers come out, they'll be closer to $20 trillion of investment. That's never been done by any country at any time, not even close.

Just over one year ago, under the radical left Democrats, we were a dead country. Now we are the hottest country, anywhere in the world. In fact, the United States economy is on pace to grow at double the rate that was projected by the IMF [International Monetary Fund] just last April. And with my growth and tariff policies, it should be much higher – I really believe we can be much higher than that. And this is all great news, and it's great for all nations.

The USA is the economic engine on the planet. And when America booms, the entire world booms. It's been the history. When it goes bad, it goes bad, the whole… You all follow us down, and you follow us up. And we're at a point that we've never, I don't believe we've ever been, I never thought we could do it this quickly. My biggest surprise is I thought it would take more than a year, maybe like a year and one month, but it's happened very quickly.

This afternoon, I want to discuss how we have achieved this economic miracle, how we intend to raise living standards for our citizens to levels never seen before. And perhaps how you, too, and the places where you come from, can do much better following what we're doing. Because certain places in Europe are not even recognizable, frankly, anymore, they're not recognizable.

And we can argue about it, but there's no argument. Friends come back from different places – I don't want to insult anybody – and say, ‘I don't recognize it,’ and that's not in a positive way. That's in a very negative way. And I love Europe, and I want to see Europe go good, but it's not heading in the right direction. In recent decades, it became conventional wisdom in Washington and European capitals that the only way to grow a modern Western economy was through ever increasing government spending, unchecked mass migration and endless foreign imports.

The consensus was that so-called dirty jobs and heavy industry should be sent elsewhere, that affordable energy should be replaced by the Green New Scam, and that countries could be propped up by importing new and entirely different populations from far-away lands.

This was the path that ‘sleepy Joe’ Biden administration and many other Western governments very foolishly followed, turning their backs on everything that makes nations rich and powerful and strong – and there's so much potential in so many nations.

The result was record budget and trade deficits and a growing sovereign deficit driven by the largest wave of mass migration in human history. We've never seen anything like it. Quite frankly, many parts of our world are being destroyed before our very eyes, and the leaders don't even understand what's happening – and the ones that do understand aren't doing anything about it.

Virtually all of the so-called experts predicted my plans to end this failed model would trigger a global recession and runaway inflation. But we have proven them wrong. It's actually just the opposite. In one year, our agenda has produced a transformation like America’s not seen in over 100 years.

Instead of closing down energy plants, we're opening them up. Instead of building ineffective money losing windmills, we're taking them down and not approving any. Instead of empowering bureaucrats, we're firing them, and they're going out and getting jobs in the private sector, for two and three times what they were making in government. So, they started off hating me when we fired them, and now they love me.

Instead of raising taxes on domestic producers, we're lowering them and raising tariffs on foreign nations to pay for the damage that they caused. In 12 months, we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls – the largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War Two. Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice. To make a country great, you can't have all federal jobs.

We've cut federal spending by $100 billion and slashed the federal budget deficit by 27% in the single year. It's going to go down quite a bit more from that, driving inflation way down from the record highs of the Biden administration. Every month they went up and up and up. I promised to cut 10 old regulations for every single new regulation, but instead I've cut – actually, till this point – 129 regulations for every one new regulation approved. So, every time they come in with a new regulation, we do at least 10. But so far, it's averaging out to 129, if you can believe it.

And we're leading the world in AI by a lot. We're leading China by a lot. I think President Xi respects what we've done, in part because I've allowed these big companies, building these massive buildings, to build their own electric capacity. They're building their own power plants, which, when added up, is more than any country, anywhere in the world, is doing. I read recently an article on The Wall Street Journal that China is creating so much energy, and they are. I got to hand it to them.

But we're creating as much or more, and we're letting them do that. I'm very proud of it. It was my idea. I said, ‘You can't create this much energy.’ We needed more than double the energy currently in the country, just to take care of the AI plants. And I said, ‘We can't do that. We have an old grid system.’ Then I came up with the idea: “You know, you people are brilliant. You have a lot of money. Let's see what you can do. You can build your own electric-generating plants.’ And they looked at me. They didn't believe me. All of the names that are, I think, in the room right now, if you want to know the truth, they didn't believe it. And I said, ‘No, no, you can.’

They came back two weeks and they didn't have the plant. They said, ‘We thought you were kidding.’ I said, ‘No, not only am I not kidding, you're going to have your approvals within two weeks.’ I always say, nuclear will, nuclear will take three weeks, but most are going that… they're going oil and gas. They're even going coal, in some cases.

Because of my landslide election victory, the United States avoided the catastrophic energy collapse which befell every European nation that pursued the Green New Scam – perhaps the greatest hoax in history. The Green New Scam: windmills all over the place, destroy your land. Destroy your land. Every time that goes around, you lose $1,000. You're supposed to make money with energy, not lose money.

Here in Europe, we've seen the fate that the radical left tried to impose on America. They tried very hard. Germany now generates 22% less electricity than it did in 2017 and it's not the current chancellor’s fault. He's solving the problem. He's going to do a great job. But, what they did before he got there… I guess that's why he got there. And electricity prices are 64% higher.

The United Kingdom produces just one-third of the total energy from all sources that it did in 1999. Think of that, one-third. And they're sitting on top of the North Sea, one of the greatest reserves anywhere in the world. But they don't use it, and that's one reason why their energy has reached catastrophically low levels with equally high prices – high prices, very low levels.

Think of that, one third and you're sitting on top of the North Sea. And they like to say, ‘Well, you know, that's depleted.’ It's not depleted. It's got 500 years. They haven't even found the oil. The North Sea is incredible. They don't let anybody drill. Environmentally, they don't let them drill. They make it impossible for the oil companies to go. They take 92% of the revenues. So, the oil companies say, ‘We can't do it.’ They came to see me, ‘Is there anything you can do?’

I want I want Europe to do great. I want UK to do great. Sitting on one of the greatest energy sources in the world, and they don't use it. In fact, their electricity prices have soared 139%. There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place, and they are losers. One thing I've noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses, and the worst that country is doing.

China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet, I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? That's a good way of looking at it. They're smart. China's very smart. They make them. They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them, but they don't use them themselves.

They put up a couple of big wind farms. But they don't use them. They just put them up to show people what they could look like. They don't spend. They don't do anything. They use a thing called coal, mostly. China goes with the coal. They go with oil and gas. They're starting to look at nuclear a little bit, and they're doing just fine. They make a fortune selling the windmills, though, and I think really, that's one that they wouldn't be surprised if it stopped. They were shocked that it continues to go. They were very friendly with me. They're shocked that people continue to buy those damn things. They killed the birds. They ruined your landscapes. Other than that, I think they're fabulous, by the way, stupid people buy them.

The consequences of such destructive policies have been stark, including lower economic growth, lower standards of living, lower birth rates, more socially disruptive migration, more vulnerability to hostile foreign adversaries, and much, much smaller militaries. The United States cares greatly about the people of Europe. We really do.

I mean, look, I am derived from Europe – Scotland and Germany. 100% Scotland, my mother. 100% German, my father. And we believe deeply in the bonds we share with Europe as a civilization. I want to see it do great. That's why issues like energy, trade, immigration and economic growth must be central concerns to anyone who wants to see a strong and united West. Because Europe and those countries have to do their thing. They have to get out of the culture that they've created over the last 10 years. It's horrible what they're doing to themselves. They're destroying themselves. It's beautiful, beautiful places.

We want strong allies, not seriously weakened ones. We want Europe to be strong. Ultimately, these are matters of national security, and perhaps no current issue makes the situation more clear than what's currently going on with Greenland. Would you like me to say a few words of Greenland? I was going to leave it out of the speech, but I thought, I think I would have been reviewed very negatively.

I have tremendous respect for both the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark, tremendous respect. But every NATO ally has an obligation to be able to defend their own territory. And the fact is, no nation, or group of nations, is in any position to be able to secure Greenland other than the United States. We're a great power, much greater than people even understand. I think they found that out two weeks ago, in Venezuela.

We saw this in World War II, when Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland. So, the United States was then compelled – we did it, we felt an obligation to do it – to send our own forces to hold the Greenland territory. And hold it we did, at great cost and expense. They didn't have a chance of getting on it, and they tried. Denmark knows that.

We literally set up bases on Greenland for Denmark. We fought for Denmark. We weren't fighting for anyone else. We were fighting to save it for Denmark. Big, beautiful piece of ice. It's hard to call it land. It's a big piece of ice. But we saved Greenland and successfully prevented our enemies from gaining a foothold in our hemisphere. So, we did it for ourselves also. And then after the war, which we won, we won it big – without us, right now, you'd all be speaking German and a little Japanese, perhaps.

After the war, we gave Greenland back to Denmark. How stupid were we to do that? But we did it, but we gave it back. But how ungrateful are they now? So now our country and the world face much greater risks than it did ever before, because of missiles, because of nuclear, because of weapons of warfare that I can't even talk about.

Two weeks ago, they saw weapons that nobody ever heard of. They weren't able to fire one shot at us. They said, ‘What happened?’ Everything was discombobulated. They said, ‘We've got them in our sights. Press the trigger.’ And nothing happened. No anti-aircraft missiles went up. There was one that went up about 30 feet and crashed down, right next to the people that sent it. They said, ‘What the hell is going on those?’ Those defensive systems were made by Russia and by China. So, they're going to go back to the drawing boards, I guess.

Greenland is a vast, almost entirely uninhabited and undeveloped territory, sitting undefended in a key strategic location between the United States, Russia and China. That's exactly where it is, right smack in the middle. Wasn't important, nearly, when we gave it back. You know, when we gave it back, it wasn't the same as it is now. It’s not important for any other reason. You know, everyone talks about the minerals, there's so many places… There's no rare earth. No such thing as rare earth. There's rare processing, but there's so much rare earth, then to get to this rare earth, you have to go through hundreds of feet of ice.

That's not the reason we need it. We need it for strategic national security and international security. This enormous unsecured island is actually part of North America, on the northern frontier of the Western Hemisphere. That's our territory. It is therefore a core national security interest of the United States of America, and in fact, it's been our policy for hundreds of years to prevent outside threats from entering our hemisphere, and we've done it very successfully. We've never been stronger than we are now.

That's why American presidents have sought to purchase Greenland for nearly two centuries. You know, for two centuries they've been trying to do it. They should have kept it after World War Two, but they had a different president. That's all right, people think differently. Much more necessary now than it was at that time.

However, in 2019 Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland's defences. But as you know, they spent less than 1% of that amount, 1%. No sign of Denmark there. And I say that with great respect for Denmark, whose people I love, whose leaders are very good.

It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it and improve it, and make it so that it's good for Europe, and safe for Europe, and good for us. And that's the reason I'm seeking immediate negotiations to, once again, discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States – just as we have acquired many other territories throughout our history. As many of the European nations have, they've acquired. There's nothing wrong with it. Many of them. Some went in reverse, actually, if you look. Some had great, vast wealth, great, vast lands, all over the world. They went in reverse. They stuck back where they started. That happens too, but some grow.

But this would not be a threat to NATO. This would greatly enhance the security of the entire alliance, the NATO Alliance. The United States is treated very unfairly by NATO. I want to tell you that. When you think about it, nobody can dispute it. We give so much, and we get so little in return. And I've been a critic of NATO for many years, and yet I've done more to help NATO than any other president, by far than any other person. You wouldn't have NATO if I didn't get involved in my first term.

The war with Ukraine is an example. We are thousands of miles away, separated by a giant ocean. It's a war that should have never started, and it wouldn't have started if the 2020 US presidential election weren't rigged. It was a rigged election. Everybody now knows that. They found out. People will soon be prosecuted for what they did. It's probably breaking news, but it should be. It was a rigged election. Can't have rigged elections. You need strong borders, strong elections, and ideally a good press. I always say it – strong borders, strong elections, free, fair elections, and a fair media.

The media is terrible. It's very crooked. It's very biased, terrible, but someday it'll straighten out, because it's losing all credibility. Think of it, when I went in a landslide, a giant landslide – won all seven swing states, won the popular vote, won everything – and I only get negative press. That means that it has no credibility. And if they're going to get credibility, they're going to have to be fair. So, you need a fair press, but you also need those other elements, and I inherited a terrible, terrible situation.

If you look, the border was open, the inflation was raging, everything was bad with the United States when I came into office. But I also inherited a mess with Ukraine and Russia, something that would have never happened. And I know Putin very well. He and I would discuss Ukraine. It was the apple of his eye, but he wasn't going to do anything. I said, ‘Vladimir, you're not doing it.’ He would never have done it. It was terrible, what happened. I could see it happening too. After I left, I could see it happening.

Biden had given Ukraine and NATO $350 billion – a staggering sum, $350 billion. I came in and just like the southern border, just like inflation, just like our economy, I said, ‘Wow, this place is in trouble,’ meaning our country, all of these things were out of control. But the border was out of control. We fixed it with the strongest border anywhere in the world.

And I've now been working on this war for one year, during which time I settled eight other wars. India, Pakistan… I've been … I settled other wars that were … Vladimir Putin called me. Armenian. Azerbaijan. He said, ‘I can't believe you settled that one.’ They were going on for 35 years. I settled it in one day. And President Putin called me. He said, ‘You know, I can't believe I worked on that war for 10 years trying to settle and I couldn't do it.’ I said, ‘Do me a favour. Focus on settling your war. Don't worry about that one.’

What does the United States get out of all of this work, all of this money – other than death, destruction, and massive amounts of cash going to people who don't appreciate what we do? They don't appreciate what we do. I’m talking about NATO, I'm talking about Europe. They have to work on Ukraine, we don’t. The United States is very far away. We have a big, beautiful ocean separating us. We have nothing to do with it.

Until I came along, NATO was only supposed to pay 2% of GDP, but they weren't paying. Most of the countries weren't paying anything. The United States was paying for virtually 100% of NATO. And I got that stopped. I said, ‘That's not fair.’ But then, more importantly, I got NATO to pay 5% and now they were paying, and now they are paying. So, something nobody said was possible. They said, ‘We will never go up higher than 2%.’ But they went to 5% and now they're paying the five. They didn't pay the two, and now they're paying the five, and they're stronger for it. And they have an excellent, by the way, Secretary General, who's possibly in the room. Mark, are you here? Yes, he's here. Hello, Mark.

We never ask for anything and we never got anything. We probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable. But I won't do that. Okay? Now everyone's saying, ‘Oh, good.’ That's probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. But I don't have to use force. I don't want to use force. I won't use force.

All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland. We already had it, as a trustee, but respectfully, returned it back to Denmark not long ago. After we defeated the Germans, the Japanese, the Italians and others in World War Two, we gave it back to them. We were a powerful force then, but we are much more powerful force now.

After I rebuilt the military in my first term, and continue to do so today, we have a budget of $1.5 trillion. We're bringing back battleships. Battleship is 100 times more powerful than the great battleships you saw in World War Two. Those great, big, gorgeous ships: the Missouri, the Iowa, the Alabama. Because I thought maybe we could take them out of mothballs. They said, ‘No, sir, these ships are 100…’ – think of that, 100 times more powerful than those big, big, magnificent pieces of art that you saw so many times ago, that you still see on television. You say, ‘Wow, what a force’ – 100 times each ship – 100 times more powerful than the big battleships of the past. So, that was the end of the mothball story.

So, what we have gotten out of NATO is nothing except to protect Europe from the Soviet Union and now Russia. I mean, we've helped them for so many years, we've never gotten anything. Except we pay for NATO, and we paid for many years, until I came along, we paid for, in my opinion, 100% of NATO, because they weren't paying their bills. And all we're asking for is to get Greenland, including right, title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it. You can't defend it on a lease. Number one, legally, it's not defensible that way, totally. And number two, psychologically, who the hell wants to defend a licence agreement or a lease, which is a large piece of ice in the middle of the ocean, where, if there is a war, much of the action will take place on that piece of ice? Think of it. Those missiles would be flying right over the centre of that piece of ice.

All we want from Denmark, for national and international security, and to keep our very energetic and dangerous potential enemies at bay, is this land on which we're going to build the greatest golden dome ever built. We're building a golden dome that's going to, just by its very nature, going to be defending Canada.

Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way. They should be grateful also, but they're not. I watched your Prime Minister yesterday, he wasn't so grateful. They should be grateful to US, Canada. Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that Mark, the next time you make your statements.

What we did for Israel was amazing, but that's nothing compared to what we have planned for the United States, Canada and the rest of the world. We are going to build a dome like no other. We did it, we did it for Israel. And by the way, I told Bibi, ‘Bibi, stop taking credit for the dome. That's our technology. That's our stuff.’ But they had a lot of courage, and they were good fighters, and they did a good job, and we wiped out the Iran nuclear threat like nobody can believe. Nobody's ever seen anything like it, that, Venezuela, taking down Soleimani, wiping out al Baghdadi when he tried to reinstitute ISIS, we did a lot. I did a lot, lot of big things, all perfectly executed. Every one was perfectly executed. Somebody told me that a military expert told me, ‘Sir, everything you've done has been perfectly executed.’ I said, ‘I know.’

So, other presidents have spent, whether foolishly or not, trillions and trillions of dollars on NATO and gotten absolutely nothing in return. We've never asked for anything. It's always a one-way street. Now they want us to help them with Ukraine. And let me say we're going to. I'm really helping, not even them, I want to see… last week, if you saw, it was 10,000 soldiers, but last month, it was 31,000 soldiers, died. 31,000 – that's this room times, the number of people in this room, times 30. Think of it, 30,000 soldiers died in one month.

The month before it was 27,000; the month before that, it was 28,000; the month before that, it was 25,000. It's a bloodbath over there, and that's what I want to stop. Doesn't help the United States. But these are souls. These are young, young people. Look like yo, look like some of you right in the front row. They go to war. Their parents are so proud … ‘Oh, there he goes.’… Two weeks later, they get a call: \Your son's head's been blown off.’ I want to stop it. It's a horrible war. It’s the worst since World War Two. They keep going, they'll exceed World War Two. The numbers are staggering, how many people they've lost. They don't want to talk about it. Ukraine and Russia lost just tremendous amounts.

And I'm dealing with President Putin, and he wants to make a deal. I believe I'm dealing with President Zelenskyy, and I think he wants to make a deal. I'm meeting him today. He might be in the audience right now. But they got to get that war stopped, because too many people are dying, needlessly dying. Too many souls are being lost. It's the only reason I’m interested in doing it.

But in doing it, I'm helping Europe. I'm helping NATO, and until the last few days when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. They called me ‘daddy’ right, last time. Very smart man said, ‘He's our daddy. He's running it.’ I was like running it. I went from running it to being a terrible human being.

But now what I'm asking for is a piece of ice, cold and poorly located that can play a vital role in world peace and world protection. It's a very small ask compared to what we have given them for many, many decades. But the problem with NATO is that, we'll be there for them 100%, but I'm not sure that they be there for us. If we gave them the call, ‘Gentlemen, we are being attacked. We're under attack by such and such a nation.’ I know them all very well, I'm not sure that they'd be there. I know we'd be there for them. I don't know that they'd be there for us. So, with all of the money we expend, with all of the blood, sweat and tears, I don't know that they'd be there for us. They're not there for us on Iceland, that I can tell you. Our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland.

So, Iceland has already cost us a lot of money. But that dip is peanuts compared to what it's gone up, and we have an unbelievable future in that stock, that stock market is going to be doubled. We're going to hit 50,000 and that stock market is going to double, in a relatively short period of time, because of everything that's happening.

But this is a good example, after giving NATO and European nations trillions and trillions of dollars in defence, they buy our weapons. We make the greatest weapons in the world, but now we're going to make them faster, much faster. You saw that. I put a cap on the salaries, and I put no buybacks, no stock buybacks, no various other things that they were doing. I mean, they were making $50 million but it would take them three years to give you a Patriot missile. I said, ‘That's not good. My chauffeur can do a better job than that, and he makes slightly less than 50.’ They make big salaries.

If they're going to make those big salaries, they're going to have to produce a lot faster. The good news is we have the greatest equipment in the world now. We're going to start making it a lot faster. They're going to additional plants. And all of the money that goes into stock buybacks is going to go into building plants. We're not allowing stock buybacks by defence companies any longer. They're going to build new plants to make Tomahawks, Patriots – we have the best equipment – F-35s, F-47, the new one just coming out. They say it's the most devastating plane, fighter jet ever. Who knows? They called it 47 if I don't like it, I'm going to take the 47 off it. I wonder why they called it 47? What to think about. But if I don't like it, I'm going to take that 47 off. But it's supposed to be the stage six, it's supposed to be the first stage six plane. Undetectable, like our B-2 bombers were undetectable, they flew right over Iran. They were undetectable, and they did their job, and they got the hell out of there.

So, we want a piece of ice for world protection. And and they won't give it. We've never asked for anything else, and we could have kept that piece of land, and we didn't. So ,they have a choice. You can say ‘yes ‘and we will be very appreciative, or you can say ‘no’ and we will remember. A strong and secure America means a strong NATO, and that's one reason why I'm working every day to ensure our military is very powerful. Our borders are very strong, and above all, our economy is strong because national security requires economic security and economic prosperity, and we have the greatest that we've ever had.
Biden and his allies destroyed our economy and gave us perhaps the worst inflation in American history. They say 48 years, I say forever – but I think 48 years is the equivalent to forever. Whether it's 48 years or ever, it's terrible, costing the typical family $33,000. What they did to this country should never, ever be forgotten. It's early, but he has to be rated as the worst president we've ever had by far.

The autopen did many, the much of the damage. The autopen, because he was autopen president, because I don't believe a sane president would have ever signed the kind of things that he signed. But now grocery prices, energy prices, air fares, mortgage rates, rent and car payments are all coming down, and they're coming down fast.

We inherited a mess, but we've done a hell of a job in 12 months. Under my most-favoured nation policy for drug prices, the cost of prescription drugs is coming down by up to 90%. Depending on the way you calculate, you could also say 5-6-7-800% – there are two ways of figuring that. But we have a favoured nations policy that every president wanted. No president was able to get. I got it, and other nations approved it, and I had to use tariffs in order to get it, because they said, ‘No way.’

In other words, a pill that cost 10% in London costs $130, think it costs $10 in London, cost $130 in New York or in Los Angeles. And I'd say, ‘Boy, that's bad.’ Friends of mine would say, ‘You know, we go to London. You can buy this stuff for nothing. We go all over the world. We could buy it for nothing.’ Because basically, America was subsidizing every nation in the world, because presidents allowed them to get away with it. It became very tough.

So, when I called up Emmanuel Macron… I watched him yesterday with those beautiful sunglasses. What the hell happened?... But I watched him sort of be tough. But he was at $10 for a pill, and I said, ‘Emmanuel, and I have the all the big pharmaceutical companies are in total agreement. It wasn't easy, by the way. They're tough, smart. They've been getting away with the scam for a long time, but they gave it up. But they said, ‘You'll never get the countries to approve it.’ I said, ‘Why is that?’ Because they won't. They always said, ‘We're not paying any more. Get the rest for the United States.’ So over the years, they stayed the same, we just went up, up, up. And, I mean, we would pay 13, 14, 15 times more than some certain countries would.

So, I said, ‘No, they'll approve it, 100%.’ ‘Sir, you'll never get them to approve it.’ I said, ‘I guarantee it.’ But I actually started with Emmanuel, who probably is in the room too. And I like him. I actually like him. Hard to believe, isn't it? And I said, ‘Emmanuel, you're going to have to lift the price of that bill to $20, maybe $30. Think of that, that means it's a doubling, a doubling of prescription drugs. Might be a tripling. Might be a quadrupling. It's not easy.’

‘No, no. Donald, I will not do that.’ I said, ‘Yes, you will 100%. He said, ‘No, no, no, you're asking me to double.’ I said, ‘Emmanuel, you've been taking advantage of the United States for 30 years with prescription drugs. You really should do it, and you will do it, I have no doubt. In fact, I am 100% sure you're going to.’ ‘No, no, no, I will not do it.’

Because, yes, in all fairness, it means to double, or triple. Because the world being a bigger place than the United States, it's not that you meet in the middle, you just have to go up some and we come down a lot. They go up a little, we come down a lot. So, we're at $130, they're at 10. So, they may have to go to 20 or 30, no more than that.’ I said, ‘Emmanuel, you're going to be doubling or tripling.’ ‘No, no, no.’ I said, ‘Here's a story, Emmanuel, the answer is, you're going to do it. You're going to do it fast. Then if you don't, I'm putting a 25% tariff on everything that you sell into the United States, and a 100% tariff on your wines and champagnes. And that's about 10 times more than what I'm requesting, and you're going to do it. I don't want to go public with it, but you may make me do that.’ ‘No, no, Donald, I will do it. I will do it.’

It took me, on average, three minutes a country, saying the same thing, ‘You will do it.’ They all said, ‘No, no, no, I will not do it. You're asking me to double the cost of prescription.’ I said, ‘That's right, because you've been screwing us for 30 years.’ And they said, ‘We will not do it.’ I said, ‘That's all right. On Monday morning, we're putting a 25, 30, 50…’ I gave different numbers for different countries.

This is also national security we're talking about, can't not fail. We're not going to subsidize the whole world. And every one of those countries have agreed to do it. So, one of the biggest things that I've done is the fact that we have now most-favoured nation, we will pay whatever the lowest price in the entire world. So, our drug prices are going to be coming down by staggering 90%. Again, you could say 1,000%, 2,000% depends on the way you want to figure it, but we'll go with the way the fake news likes it better, because it sounds … can you imagine, a 90% reduction sounds much worse. But drug prices are going to be coming down tremendously in all the nations, and I appreciate them doing it, but they did it.

In all fairness, without tariffs, I wouldn't have been able to get it done. After declining $3,000 under Biden, real incomes are up in the United States by $2,000, $3,000 and even $5,000 and more. Home ownership has always been a symbol of health and vigour of American society, but that goal fell out of reach for millions and millions of people in the Biden era because interest rates went up so high.

Today, I'm taking action to bring back this bedrock of the American dream. In recent years, Wall Street giants and institutional investment firms – many of you are here. many of you are good friends of mine, many of you are supporters, sorry to do this. I'm so sorry, but you've driven up housing prices by purchasing hundreds of thousandss of single family homes, and it's been a great investment for them. Often, as much as 10% of houses on the market. You know, the crazy thing is, a person can't get depreciation on a house, but when a corporation buys it, they get depreciation. Okay, that's something we're going to have to think about too. I don't know if too many people think about that.

You buy a corporation. They buy 500 houses. They buy hundreds of thousands. They buy 500 houses. They can take depreciation. A person sweats and works and buys one house, they can't. But homes are built for people, not for corporations, and America will not become a nation of renters. We're not going to do that. That's why I have signed an executive order banning large institutional investors from buying single family homes. It's just not fair to the public. They're not they're not able to buy a house. And I'm calling on Congress to pass that ban into permanent law, and I think they will

One of the biggest barriers to saving for a down payment has been surging credit card debt. The profit margin for credit card companies now exceeds 50%, one of the biggest. And they charge Americans interest rates of 28%, 30%, 31%, 32%, whatever happened to usury? So, to help our citizens recover from the Biden disaster, all caused by this horrible, just horrible president, I'm asking Congress to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year. And this will help millions of Americans save for a home. They have no idea they're paying 28% they go out there a little late in their payment, and they end up losing their house. It's terrible.

To unleash innovation and savings and financing, I'm also working to ensure America remains the crypto capital of the world. And to that end, last year, I signed a landmark GENIUS Act into law. Now Congress is working very hard on crypto market structure, legislation, bitcoin, all of them, which I hope to sign very soon, unlocking new pathways for Americans to reach financial freedom.

And I did it for two reasons. Number one, I thought it was politically good, and it was, I got tremendous political report, support. But more importantly, China wanted that market too. It's just like they want the AI, and we've got that market, I think, pretty well locked up. If I didn't do it… You know, Biden was totally against it, until before the election, when they realized that, you know, there were millions of people voting against him over crypto, and all of a sudden they loved it very much, but it was too late. They blew it. But it is politically popular, but it's it's much more importantly, we have to make it so that China doesn't get the hold of it, and once they have that hold, we're not going to be able to get it back. ,So I'm honoured to have done it.

Finally, I've instructed government backed institutions to purchase up to $200 billion in mortgage bonds to bring down interest rates. And I'll be announcing a new Fed chairman in the not-too-distant future. I think he'll do a very good job. Say, gave away some of it. He did give that away. So, we have something, get something, but somebody that's very respected. They're all respected. They're all great. Everyone that I interviewed is great. Everyone could do, I think, a fantastic job. Problem is they change once they get the job, they do. They said everything I want to hear and then they get the job, they're locked in for six years, they get the job, and all of a sudden, ‘Let's raise rates a little bit.’ I call them, ‘Sir, we'd rather not talk about this.’ It's amazing how people change once they have the job. It's too bad, sort of disloyalty, but they got to do what they think is right.

We have a terrible chairman right now, Jerome ‘Too late’ Powell. He's always too late, and he's very late with interest rates, except before the election, he was just fine for the other side. So, we, we're going to have somebody that's great, and we hope he does the right job. Last week, the average 30-year mortgage rate dropped below 6% for the first time in many years. Another major factor in driving up housing costs was the mass invasion of our borders.

And I have to say one thing about housing, because nobody ever says this. I am very protective of people that already own a house, of which we have millions and millions and millions. And because we have had a such a good run, the house values have gone up tremendously. And these people have become wealthy. They weren’t wealth, they’ve become wealthy because of their house. And every time you make it more and more and more affordable for somebody to buy a house cheaply, you're actually hurting the value of those houses, obviously, because the one thing works in tandem with the other. And I don't want to do anything that's going to hurt the value of people that own a house, who, for the first time in their lives, are walking around the streets of whatever city they're in, very proud that their house is worth $500-600-700,000.

Now, if I want to really crush the housing market, I could do that so fast that people could buy houses, but you would destroy a lot of people that already have houses. In some cases, they've mortgaged their house, and the mortgage would be very low, and all of a sudden, the mortgage, without any changes, becomes very high, and they end up losing the house. I'm not going to hurt. And I speak with Scott, who's doing a fantastic job, and Howard, who's doing a fantastic job, and all of my people, and I always say, ‘Look, you know, I can crush the hell out of the market. We can drop interest rates to a level…’ And that's one thing we do want to do, that's natural, that's good for everybody.

You know, the dropping of the interest rates, we should be paying a much lower interest rate than we are. We should. We should be paying the lowest interest rate of any country in the world, because without the United States, you don't have a country. I mean, I had a case with Switzerland. We happen to be in Switzerland. Maybe I'll give you a quick story.

But they were paying nothing. They make beautiful watches, great watches, Rolex, all of them, they were paying nothing to the United States when they sent their product in. And we had a $41 billion deficit, 41 billion with this beautiful place – flew over, it isn't it nice? So I said, ‘Let's put a 30% tariff on them so that we get back some of it. ‘Not all of it at all. We still have a deficit, big deficit.’ We have 40, 41 million. That's a big deficit. And I said, ‘Let's put a tariff on.’ Different tariffs, different places, you’re all party to them, some cases, victims to them. But in the end, it's a fair thing, and most of you realize that.

But we put a 30% tariff on Switzerland, and all hell broke loose in. They were calling, I mean, like you wouldn't believe. And I know so many people from Switzerland, incredible place, incredible, brilliant place, but I didn't realize that they're only good because of us. And there's so many other examples, I mean us, probably other places, but a majority of the money they make is because of us, because we never charged him anything.

So, they come in, they sell their watches, no tariffs, no nothing. They walk away. They make $41 billion on just us. So, I said, ‘No, we can't do that.’ So I'm going to bring it up, but still would have a deficit pretty substantial, but I brought it up to 30% and the I guess Prime Minister, I don't think President, I think Prime Minister, called. A woman, and she was very repetitive. She said, ‘No, no, no, you cannot do that. 30%, you cannot do that. We are a small, small country.’ I said, ‘Yeah, but you have a big, big deficit. You may be small, but you have a bigger deficit than big countries.’ I said, ‘No, no, no, please. You cannot do it.’ Kept saying the same thing over and over, ‘We are a small country.’ I said, ‘But you're a big country in terms of …’ And she just rubbed me the wrong way, I'll be honest with you. And I said, ‘Alright, thank you, ma'am, appreciate it. Do not do this. Thank you very much, ma'am.’

And I made it 39% and then all hell really broke out. And I was paid visits by everybody. Rolex came to see me, they all came to see me. But I realized, and I reduced it because I don't want to hurt people. I don't want to hurt them. And we brought it down to, you know, lower level. Doesn't mean it's not going up, but we brought it down to a lower level, but they pay now, tariffs.

But, but I realized that we have many places like that where they're making a fortune because of the United States. Without the United States, they wouldn't be making anything. Think of it. Switzerland made $41 billion on us. And as she said, it's a small place. And I realized with that, I don't know I was so… because she was so aggressive. And I realized in that conversation that the United States is keeping the whole world afloat. Many places, I could give you six, seven places, just in the people in this little area, I know every one of them, they're sort of, they're looking down. They don't want to see me, and they don't want to stare me in the eyes. But they're taking advantage of, everybody took advantage of the United States.

But I've been very fair, and I gave them a tariff, and it was fine, but I realized that without us, it's not Switzerland anymore. Without us. It's not any of the countries that are represented here. And we want to work with the countries. We want to work with them. We're not looking to destroy them. I could have said 39-40% I could have I could have said, ‘I want a 70% tariff’, then we would make money with Switzerland. But Switzerland would have been probably destroyed, financially destroyed. I don't want to do that.

But we should be paying the lowest interest rate of everybody. I hope Scott's listening to this, because we should be paying the lowest interest rate of everybody. Without us, without us, most of the countries don't even work. And then you have the protection factor. Without our military, which is the greatest in the world by far, without our military, you have threats that you would never you wouldn't believe. You wouldn't believe you don't have threats because of us, and that's because of NATO.

One other thing, and I have to say it so importantly, in the old days, I used to say, ‘I'm the youngest in the room.’ Now I'm among the older. I hate to say it. I don't feel old, but I'm among the older. But I remember not long ago, 20, 25 years ago, when good news came out about, let's say the United States. ‘The United States had a great quarter.’ ‘The United States had a great month.’ All the stocks went up, and that's the way it's supposed to be.

Now, when they say the ‘United States had a record quarter, it's unbelievable how well it's doing.’ All the stocks crash because they say, ‘Oh no, inflation, inflation, they're going to raise interest rates.’ And they do, some of these stupid people like Powell. They raise interest rates. What they do is they stop you from being successful. It used to be when we had a great quarter, a great month, great earnings, great anything, any good news, the stock market went up. That's the way it's going to be, we got to do that again, because that's the way it should be.

Now, when we have a great month, they want to kill i. tLike we did over 5% where people were surprised. We should do 20% we could do 25%. When we announce good numbers, and the reason is they're so petrified of inflation. And growth doesn't mean inflation. We've had tremendous growth with very low inflation. In fact, growth can fight inflation, proper growth. So, we want to get back to the days when we announce great numbers.

Because we're going to be announcing phenomenal … you know, all these factories that are being built at record, thousands of businesses are being built right now. Remember, $18 trillion is invested. I think that the second number is three, and that was China many years ago. Investments in the country from outside – 18 trillion never, nobody's ever seen. And that's money coming in and building things, factories. Thousands of businesses are being built, thousands. Hundreds of big factories.

Car plants are moving back to the United States. They're coming in from Canada. They're coming in from Mexico, from Japan. Japan's coming in and building plants here, in order to avoid tariffs. They're coming in from China. They're coming in from all over the world. We have more plants being built now, car plants that we've ever had built, even in the heyday from the 1940s and 50s. And they're bigger. They don't use renovations anymore, where they take an old … they rip it down, they build a brand new plant, super modern plant. But it's happening at levels that nobody's ever seen.

In 2024, the US built less than 2 million new homes, but Biden admitted more than 8 million new migrants, and those days are over. In 2025 for the first time in 50 years, the United States had reverse migration. Boy, that was nice, and these were criminals that were being taken out of our country. Because they allowed people to come into our country from jails, from gangs, drug dealers, murderers – 11,888 murderers. We've gotten most of them out.
And then ICE gets beat up by stupid people, from leadership in Minnesota. We actually are helping Minnesota so much, but they don't appreciate it. Most places do. You know Washington, DC is the safest place now in the United States? It was a very dangerous place to walk, and now you can walk with your wife, your kids, right through the middle of the city. Right now, Washington, DC is as safe as it gets. It was one of the most unsafe, I had to admit, we sent in the military, the National Guard. Within two months, it was great. Within three months, it's like, it's like a really great place, and a safe place, and a beautiful place. It's even been cleaned up. The graffiti is gone. Fences are gone. We don’t have to worry about fences anymore. All of the places, the grasses are cut and replaced with new grass in many cases, it's all going to happen in the spring.

But Washington, DC is beautiful again, and it's safe. New restaurants are opening up. They were all closing now you can't get into a restaurant. Restaurants in Washington, DC are all opening. Memphis, also. Memphis, Tennessee, New Orleans, Louisiana. We're there for three weeks. It's cut, we've cut the crime down to, by 64%. Within another month, we’ll have virtually no crime there. We can do that all over. We're going to help the people in California. We want to have no crime. I know Gavin was here. I used to get along so great with Gavin when I was president. Gavin's a good guy, and we're going to if he needed it. I would do it in a heartbeat. I'd love to see… We did help them a lot in Los Angeles, a lot with the early, early in my term, when they had some problems. But we would love to do it.

I would say this, if I were a Democrat governor or whatever, I would call up Trump, I'd say, ‘Come on in make us look good,’ because we're cutting crime down to nothing. And we're taking people out, career criminals who are only going to do bad things, and we're bringing them back to their countries. But where we've done it, it's been amazing, and we have a capacity to do it at much greater levels.

We're cutting illegal aliens off welfare and other government benefits, and I have directed that, starting immediately, there will be no more payments to sanctuary cities, because they are really just sanctuaries for criminals. They're really protecting criminals, and those are the ones we have to get out of the country – murderers, drug dealers, the mentally insane. They emptied their mental institutions into the United States. And despite that, we have the lowest crime numbers that we've ever had in the history of the country. Just came out.

But equally importantly, we're cracking down on more than $19 billion in fraud that was stolen by Somalian bandits. Can you believe that Somalia… they turned out to be higher IQ than we thought? And we say, these are low IQ people, how do they go into Minnesota and steal all that money? And we have, you know, their pirates, they’re good pirates, right, but we shoot them out of the water, just like we shoot the drug boats out.

They're not pirating too many boats lately, do you notice? when they go out into those boats, they want to take over a billion-and-a-half dollar tanker loaded up with oil, and they say, ‘We're going to blow up your boat.’ They have powerful weapons. You hit the side of the boat. You blow the whole thing up. The insurance companies are petrified, so they say, ‘Just give them the boat. We'll give them money instead.’ And I don't do that. We blow them right the hell out of the water. We see them going out. We blow them out of the water. We don't have any pirates so much anymore. If we do, they won't be there long.

We've cut down with the hitting of the boats that are loaded up with drugs, including submarines. Can you believe they actually buy small… they’re called mini subs, very fast. They're meant for drugs. We've knocked out two of them. The Democrats say, ‘They were fishing. You have ruined somebody's fishing.’ I would say a submarine is not a fishing boat. You don't fish. But we've knocked down drugs by water, the oceans, the sea by 97.2%, think of that. And I actually say, ‘Who the hell are the 3%?’ Because I would not want to be piled on any one of those boats. We knocked them down, and now we're going to start on land. We're going to knock it all out. The land is the easy part, that what we did on Sea is incredible, and that's our great military.

The situation in Minnesota reminds us that the West cannot mass import foreign cultures, which have failed to ever build a successful society of their own. I mean, we're taking people from Somalia, and Somalia is a failed … it's not a nation, got no government, got no police, got no mili… got no nothing. And then we have this fake Congress person, who they just reported is worth $30 million you believe this? Ilhan Omar talking about the Constitution that provides me … she comes from a country that's not a country, and she's telling us how to run America. Not going to get away with it much longer, let me tell you.

The explosion of prosperity, and conclusion, and progress that built the West, did not come from our tax codes, it ultimately came from our very special culture. This is the precious inheritance that America and Europe have in common. We share it. We share it. We have to keep it strong. We have to become stronger, more successful and more prosperous than ever. We have to defend that culture and rediscover the spirit that lifted the West from the depths of the Dark Ages to the pinnacle of human achievement.

We live in a incredible, changing period. It's an unbelievable time, but we have to take advantage of the time, that we're in. In our hands are technologies that our ancestors could scarely… I mean, they couldn't have even dreamt some of the things that we see today. And so rapidly they're produced. I mean, AI two years ago, nobody ever heard the term, and now everybody's talking about it. And it can have some very good purpose. It could also have some dangerous purpose, and for that, we have to watch out. But things are happening because of it, and we're leading by so much. We're doing so well.

But opportunities that are bigger and grander than ever before in human history are right before us. It is the pioneers in this room. Many of you in this room are true pioneers. You're truly brilliant, brilliant people. Just your ability to get a ticket is brilliant, because you have about 50 people for every seat. I don't know what … that's Larry. Everything Larry touches turns to gold. He made this very successful. But you're in this room, and some of you are the greatest leaders anywhere in the world. You're the greatest brains anywhere in the world. And the future is unlimited. And to a large part because of you or we have to protect you and we have to cherish you.

I always say we have to cherish our brilliant people, because there aren't many of them. So together with confidence, boldness and persistence, let us lift up our people, grow our economies, defend our shared destiny, and build a future for our citizens that is more ambitious, more exciting, more inspiring and greater than the world has ever seen. We're in a position to do things that nobody else has ever even thought of before.

And many of the people in this room are the ones that are doing it, and I want to congratulate you. And I'm with you all the way you can do things that nobody else can even think about. So, I congratulate you on your tremendous success. And the United States is back, bigger, stronger, better than ever before, and I'll see you around. Thank you all very much. Thank you very much.